- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:35:33 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/24/2012 01:50 AM, Phil Cupp wrote: > I'm just saying that items that have the same Grid position overlap by design - it's not a problem to be solved. However, I'm fine with defining better ways to resolve those positions automatically with the auto placement algorithm. We can also consider making the auto placement algorithm on by default so that authors don’t experience "data loss" after setting display to grid. I think I'd prefer that. :) It also means that this: display: grid; grid-columns: (1fr)[3]; automatically arranges all the children into a grid. Which makes a lot of sense to me. I'm a little concerned in tying the completion of grid to the adoption of auto placement, though, especially since you've noted you're not 100% happy with it yet. Perhaps the default "on" behavior could be simplified to just put things in new rows, one item per grid slot, rather than trying to find holes in the existing grid? A more sophisticated algorithm that looks for holes could be switched on explicitly with 'grid-auto-flow' later. I think that would be easier for authors to understand as well: the placement of un-positioned items is more predictable that way. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 06:12:39 UTC