Re: [css3-flexbox] containing block for absolutely positioned children of a flexbox

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
>> Just wanted to be sure I'm understanding correctly: flexboxes do *not* act
>> as containing blocks for absolutely-positioned children, correct? Instead,
>> the flexbox's closest ancestor that is a block will serve that purpose. (?)
>
> They should follow the same model as the rest of CSS: the abs-pos containing
> block is the nearest positioned ancestor. Which could be a flexbox.

Yes.

~TJ