- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:48:50 +1300
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 19:49:20 UTC
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>wrote: > Just wanted to be sure I'm understanding correctly: flexboxes do *not* act > as containing blocks for absolutely-positioned children, correct? Instead, > the flexbox's closest ancestor that is a block will serve that purpose. (?) > They should follow the same model as the rest of CSS: the abs-pos containing block is the nearest positioned ancestor. Which could be a flexbox. Rob -- "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 19:49:20 UTC