- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:43:33 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 02/02/2012, at 5:36 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:58:33 +0100, Sylvain Galineau >> <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> I assume animation-iteration-count:0 means no animation occurs and no >>> animation events are thrown regardless of duration and delay. >>> >>> Does animation-fill-mode have any effect in this case? >> >> When I raised this back in >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0107.html>, David >> argued that it would make sense to avoid a discontinuity at 0. With that >> reasoning, >> >> - start event and end event should dispatch at the end of the delay >> - fill mode 'backwards'/'both' should have an effect during the delay phase >> - fill mode 'forwards'/'both' should have an effect after the delay phase > > I agree with dbaron that this is the ideal behavior. Me too. It's pretty simple to understand. Dean
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 21:44:03 UTC