- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 05:36:59 -0800
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:58:33 +0100, Sylvain Galineau > <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >> I assume animation-iteration-count:0 means no animation occurs and no >> animation events are thrown regardless of duration and delay. >> >> Does animation-fill-mode have any effect in this case? > > When I raised this back in > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0107.html>, David > argued that it would make sense to avoid a discontinuity at 0. With that > reasoning, > > - start event and end event should dispatch at the end of the delay > - fill mode 'backwards'/'both' should have an effect during the delay phase > - fill mode 'forwards'/'both' should have an effect after the delay phase I agree with dbaron that this is the ideal behavior. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 13:37:41 UTC