- From: Shawn Ligocki <sligocki@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:32:50 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACNG_46MFm=V8gWYOzr2LtjANoYGM1RBJq5w1=tJbHXynaqjpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Should the following statement be parsable? @media all and(color) { ... } and equivalent to: @media all and (color) { ... } Where ... are valid rulesets. Notice the lack of space between "and" and "(color)". Production rules on http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/ seems to imply that the whitespaces are optional: media_query : [ONLY | NOT]? S* media_type S* [ AND S* expression ]* | expression [ AND S* expression ]* ; But Webkit and https://github.com/tabatkins/css-parser don't seem to parse it that way. I'm guessing this is because of the lexer will parses "and(color)" as a FUNCTION and thus render this as an invalid CSS media query. https://github.com/tabatkins/css-parser seems to confirm this: AT(media) WS IDENT(all) WS FUNCTION(and) IDENT(color) ) Is this correct? That this statement should be treated as malformed and thus ignored (rendered as "@media not all { ... }")? Thanks, -Shawn Ligocki
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 21:33:38 UTC