- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 01:16:34 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 08:17:26 UTC
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:03 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > > Kato-san has already pointed out the lack of prioritization between > the definitions of 'word-break' and 'line-break' as currently > specified in CSS3 Text. [1] > > But I think a larger issue is that this property defines three levels > of breaking, 'loose', 'normal', and 'strict' with only suggestions as > to what the exact meaning of these levels are. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#line-break What do you mean by "suggestions"? The current spec provides sufficiently precise meaning for these terms, at least sufficiently specific to implement and test in Webkit [1][2][3]. On the point of optionality that you make, I agree it would be best to NOT mark the feature as optional. [1] http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/LineBreaking [2] http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/LineBreakingCSS3Mapping [3] https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=172397&action=prettypatch
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 08:17:26 UTC