- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:39:27 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The CSS Exclusions specification uses <uri> to reference SVG shapes[1]. This should be changed to <funcIRI>, to be consistent with SVG and Filter Effects. >>> >>> It should actually be using <url>, as that's the name defined in CSS3 >>> Values (we've been inconsistent in the past about which name to use). >>> >>> SVG's <funcIRI> is identical to CSS's <url>, except more confusingly named. ^_^ >> No, <url> takes an <URI> as input [1], <FuncIRI> takes an <IRI>[2] as input. <URI> is a subset of <IRI> and SVG (even in the current WD) requires IRI support. Even so they can be converted to each other. Furthermore SVG1.2T has the following sentence: "Other W3C specifications are expected to be revised over time to remove these duplicate descriptions of the escaping procedure and to refer to IRI directly." > > The differences between a URL, URI, and IRI as defined by the various > standards bodies are irrelevant to authors. CSS doesn't care - it > takes whatever browsers choose to accept as a "url". The grammar of > url() is basically just "url(, then anything that's not a ) > character", which encompasses all of the various silly terms. We just > use the "<url>" grammar token for it, because that's the term most > familiar to authors. According to CSS 2.1[1] url() on CSS uses URI, as specified by [2]. Which is just a subset of IRI. IRI can be seen as "URI or sequence of characters plus an algorithm"[3]. So even if authors don't care (and they shouldn't need to) and even if implementations do it right already, it needs to be specified. Even if there is just a link to [4]. Greetings, Dirk [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/syndata.html#uri [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/linking.html#IRIReference [4] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt > > ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 22:39:57 UTC