- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:43:45 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The CSS Exclusions specification uses <uri> to reference SVG shapes[1]. This should be changed to <funcIRI>, to be consistent with SVG and Filter Effects. >> >> It should actually be using <url>, as that's the name defined in CSS3 >> Values (we've been inconsistent in the past about which name to use). >> >> SVG's <funcIRI> is identical to CSS's <url>, except more confusingly named. ^_^ > No, <url> takes an <URI> as input [1], <FuncIRI> takes an <IRI>[2] as input. <URI> is a subset of <IRI> and SVG (even in the current WD) requires IRI support. Even so they can be converted to each other. Furthermore SVG1.2T has the following sentence: "Other W3C specifications are expected to be revised over time to remove these duplicate descriptions of the escaping procedure and to refer to IRI directly." The differences between a URL, URI, and IRI as defined by the various standards bodies are irrelevant to authors. CSS doesn't care - it takes whatever browsers choose to accept as a "url". The grammar of url() is basically just "url(, then anything that's not a ) character", which encompasses all of the various silly terms. We just use the "<url>" grammar token for it, because that's the term most familiar to authors. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 19:44:33 UTC