- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:42 -0700
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:59 AM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > | Do you know of any examples of devices that do even 4 levels? Every > | device I know of that adjusts to ambient light just has a two-stage > | switch between light and dark. For example, that's what google maps > | does. > > You're right, I don't know any application which use 4 levels. > > Meanwhile, in his experiment, Microsoft concluded 3 levels were useful for > light-aware applications: dim, normal and washed [1]. Even if it's very > difficult to find light-aware apps these days, this doesn't mean that this > is not useful, just that nobody cared to implement that. Meanwhile, it's > easy to find independent reviewers giving the advice to increase font size > in direct sunlight (so users do take action in that case) [2] and you can > find designers at stackoverflow giving tips such as using high contrast and > making the font bolder on mobile website likely used outdoor [3]. > > I believe that when the screen's brightness can't be increased further to > compensate decently the ambient light conditions, the designer should be > able to take actions to make things better the same way it does when the > ambient light is too low (night mode). > > [1] http://www.techmynd.com/ipad-direct-sunlight-exposure/ > [2] > http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081030/windows-7-and-light-sensors-let-there-be-light/ > [3] > http://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/15887/how-does-use-in-bright-sunlight-affect-how-a-web-site-should-be-designed That seems reasonably convincing. Okay, I accept the usefulness of three light levels. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:50:35 UTC