Re: List of selectors under consideration for Selectors Level 4? from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com on 2012-08-16 (www-style@w3.org from August 2012)

From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:07:14 +0400
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Houston <gregory.houston@gmail.com>,fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>,"www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <793761345129634@web30g.yandex.ru>

16.08.2012, 18:46, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>:
> Instead of "p - ul" (select a <ul> whose following sibling is a <p>),
> do "!ul + p".  Same selector as always, but the ! tells the engine
> which element is the "subject" of the selector.
>
> As Marat says, you can combine this with :matches() if you then want
> to chain off of the element.

Marat said this combination is horrible compared with previous-sibling combinator.

Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 15:07:44 UTC