- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:59:07 +0200
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Peter Moulder: > css3-gcpm introduces modifiers such as 'snap' or 'unless-room' for the > value of 'float' that can mean that the box isn't actually floated. Correct. > I wonder how this should interact with the various bits of CSS that make a > strong distinction between in-flow and out-of-flow boxes. Some of these > decisions come quite early in the layout process, such as anonymous block > box generation. > > The interaction as currently specified is that: > > # An element is called out of flow if it is floated [or ...]. > # An element is called in-flow if it is not out-of-flow. > > I haven't thought much about how much of a problem this causes, but I am a > bit nervous about such foundations as initial box tree generation depending > on global layout choices. > > I think that the spec should at least draw attention to this sort of > consequence of the float-or-in-flow decision for such a box. Good point. How about saying that the element is considered to be a float even when the condition doesn't apply? This will allow more document processing to take place before laying out the document. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 14:59:55 UTC