On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > So, based on the discussions on this thread, what does the group feel > about defining a new global named "CSS", which we use to hang new > css-related things off of that may not be worth polluting the global > object with (or that would require a cumbersome name if they were put > on the global). > > I don't like this idea. There's nothing like this in the platform yet, and the difference between CSS.PixelValue and CSSPixelValue is one letter. Either way, supports() really needs to be a document level feature anyway because browsers support different CSS properties in standards vs quirks mode (IE...), or even in extensions or apps vs web pages (ex -moz-binding). document.supportsCSS(property, value) is what you want. - E
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 06:38:30 UTC