- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:55:18 -0700
- To: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 08/14/2012 03:03 AM, Sebastian Zartner wrote: > * One for all elements representing possible drop targets > that could receive the item. > * One for all elements representing drop targets that do > not accept this type of item. > > This sounds like these two pseudo-classes would do exactly the opposite. > So why not use :not() for this case? That question was asked and answered here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/0417.html Apparently an invalid dropzone is one that accepts drops, but not of this type, so it's not exactly the same as :not(:valid-drop). I'm unsure if it's necessary to add at this point, but can add it and mark at-risk for the time being. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 18:55:46 UTC