Re: [selectors4] drag-and-drop pseudo-classes

14.08.2012, 08:19, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>:
>    b) what these pseudo-elements should be called, that would best
>       (most clearly and succinctly) represent their functionality
>       to authors using them
>
> Name sets being considered:
>
>      Set A         Set B       Set C            Set D
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>   :active-drop    :drop        :current-drop    :active-drop
>   :drop           :can-drop    :valid-drop      :valid-drop
>   :no-drop        :no-drop     :invalid-drop    :invalid-drop

>From these options, set B seems to be most intuitive for me.

Though, it may make sense to use more specific `:drop-target` name instead of just `:drop` for first of pseudoclasses. Also, `:cannot-drop` maybe is more consistent with `:can-drop` and thus more suitable than `no-drop` (when using in same set as `:can-drop`). Also, `drop` may be used as a prefix (be at the beginning of pseudoclass name) for the all three. Alternatively, `valid`/`invalid` instead of `can`/`cannot` could be fine too. Sothat we'd end up with one of following two sets:

     Set MT1         Set MT2
  ---------------------------------
    :drop-target    :drop-target
    :drop-can       :drop-valid
    :drop-cannot    :drop-invalid