- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:19:28 -0400
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Le Ven 10 août 2012 0:03, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : > On 8/9/12 11:59 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >> I've added 'table-layout: fixed' to the test and the necessary table >> objects into >> >> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/overflow-applies-to-007a-version2.xht >> >> and all browsers are still failing that version2 test, as coded. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#fixed-table-layout says: > > The table's width may be specified explicitly with the 'width' > property. A value of 'auto' (for both 'display: table' and 'display: > inline-table') means use the automatic table layout algorithm. > > so you're still getting the same behavior as "table-layout: auto" > because your table doesn't have a fixed width.... Doh! I understand now. Thank you again for your accurate reply. I'll probably submit later version3 and version4 as 007a and 007b into the test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/overflow-applies-to-007a-version3.xht http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/overflow-applies-to-007a-version4.xht Gérard -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 04:19:57 UTC