- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:17 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > On 7/08/2012 10:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> * Added conic-gradient() function > > Liking very much. About repeating conic gradients. What happens with the > interpolation of color when angles similar to below are given? > > repeating-conic-gradient(white 0deg, red 100deg) > > Once it makes it way around and back to 360 degrees you will have one uneven > span between two color stops (the last possible one and the first one). Like > so. > > white 0deg > red 100deg > white 200deg > red 300deg > white 400deg <-- outside of possible range > > The same would apply to values like 0% being followed by 30%. > > white 0% > red 30% > white 60% > red 90% > white 120% <-- outside of possible range You just follow the spec. Only colors between 0deg and 360deg (or 0% and 100%) are painted, but color-stops can be placed anywhere on the gradient line, and they can affect interpolation. (Note that your expansion is incorrect - the next "virtual" white stop is at 100px, not 200px. I'll assume you meant to write out "white 0deg, red 100deg, white 200deg" in the original function.) So, repeating-conic-gradient(white 0deg, red 100deg, white 200deg) is exactly equivalent to conic-gradient(white 0deg, red 100deg, white 200deg, red 300deg, #f99 360deg); As Sebastian says, this is exactly the same behavior as repeating-radial-gradient(), which doesn't paint any color below 0%. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 16:22:09 UTC