- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:30:04 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > This is masquerading in the native space as if it were native, so if > it ever were implemented there might well be API differences. Why > shouldn't there be a single simple logic that applies in all cases? > > Again, maybe I am alone in that, but it seems weird that proof of > concept requires no prefix, but then browsers do and then later it > doesn't. Those seem like three different potential phases that > shouldn't interfere - as long as they don't use a -moz- prefix or > something there is no danger that they could interfere (or conflict) > with a browser implementation, but native they could. Oh, sorry, I completely missed that you were talking about the JS shim, not the actual spec. Carry on. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 19:30:52 UTC