- From: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:55:15 +1000
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGTfzwQsadz3vYcr4sCfG5xy0yUhcSJJOa1ULN4RiURtD=o0-A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Roc, Personally I think IE9 has it right... it seems to match my intuition that RTL is a mirror version of LTR, and conserves the ability to scroll to the start by setting scrollLeft to 0. Perhaps this is something that needs to be discussed in a CSSWG meeting? It seems there's wide divergence in implementations. Cheers, -Shane On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > How should scrollLeft work with RTL? There are some major differences > across browsers. > http://people.mozilla.org/~roc/test_rtl_scrollLeft.html > Try scrolling the elements and clicking in them. > > In Gecko nightly, scrollLeft=0 corresponds to the rightmost scrolled > position and increases from left to right (so scroll positions are > negative). Opera seems to behave the same way. > > Chrome (22 dev) behaves the same way when scrolling the viewport (for both > toplevel documents and iframes). Unfortunately scrolling a regular element > works quite differently: scrollLeft=0 corresponds to the leftmost scroll > position (but still increases to the right). > > In IE9, scrollLeft=0 corresponds to the rightmost scrolled position but > scrollLeft increases as you scroll from right to left! > > I'm unsure which behavior is best. I think most Web content I've seen that > uses scrollLeft assumes its minimum value is zero and it increases from > left to right, because of course that's how LTR behaves. Unfortunately > that's almost the least popular option in implementations. I'm considering > changing Gecko to do it that way for RTL anyway. AFAIK the main > disadvantage of that approach (other than being a behavior change) is that > you lose the ability to easily scroll "to the start" by setting scrollLeft > to 0. Then again, I haven't noticed people trying to do that on the > horizontal axis. > > Any thoughts, before I go ahead? :-) > > Rob > -- > “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your > enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute > you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love > those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax > collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you > doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47] >
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 04:55:44 UTC