- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:13:35 +0200
- To: "Mark Boulton" <mark@markboulton.co.uk>, <www-style@w3.org>
At this point of time, the CSS Grid specification doesn't have a concept of module at all. Therefore, I think that most concepts based on the module definition don't apply to it. The addition of a module-based layout option for the CSS Grid specification can (and should) be considerated for further revisions of the specification as it cover some layouts that are currently not optimally covered by CSS Grids (consistent spacing between columns in an automatically layouted grid is a good example of this). Meanwhile, in order to allow this specification to hit browsers as soon as possible, I would prefer if this addition could be discussed as part of CSS Grid Level 2 instead of Level 1. However, based on your mail, I think we can do a better job in following the existing naming conventions : - Grid Lines should be called Grid Gutters - Grid Cells should be called Grid Fields Grid Rows and Grid Columns are by definition running the full height/width of the grid, which explains their name. -----Message d'origine----- From: Mark Boulton Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:29 PM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: [css3-grid-layout] Suggestions for terminology amendments In reference to: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-grid-layout/#core-concepts-of-the-grid I'm confused as to the need to invent new terminology with regards to grids that have existed for centuries. I'm also a little concerned that the mental model this terminology builds is one more similar to tables and spreadsheets (where these terms could be interchangeable) than to grids and layout. Specifically on the terminology: - Grid Lines are known as Gutters. - Grid Cells are known as Modules (or Units – the term is interchangeable). They represent the smallest building block of the grid. - Combinations of modules vertically are Columns *if* they run the full height of the grid. - Combinations of modules horizontally are Rows *if* they run the full width of the grid - Combinations of modules both vertically and horizontally are Fields. There's a lot of great stuff in this draft, but some of the theory of designing grids has been around for centuries. If we could start to align CSS with existing terminology, and existing mental models of how layout is designed, then all the better. Just a thought… For more information on this, I wrote a blog post last year that expands on some of this thinking: http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/rethinking-css-grids Thanks for your time and consideration, Mark Boulton
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 15:13:59 UTC