- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:21:04 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:11 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 04/25/2012 02:40 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> There seem to be at least three advantages, if, perhaps, relatively minor ones. >> >> 1) 'device-pixel-ratio: 2' is more readily understandable - ddpx is a mysterious abbreviation. >> 2) device-pixel-ratio is deployed in existing content (albeit with a webkit prefix); declining to standardize it seems likely to increase the scope of the prefix problem. >> 3) device-pixel-ratio has actual deployment experience showing it is usable for its intended purpose. >> >> In what way is 'resolution: 2ddpx' better? > > It doesn't add anything new. It uses an existing mechanism to do the same thing. I don't follow closely, so I may be misinformed, but isn't the dppx unit something new? It looks like it wasn't present in the Sept 11 Working Draft of Values & Units. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 17:21:41 UTC