- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:11:25 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/25/2012 02:40 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > There seem to be at least three advantages, if, perhaps, relatively minor ones. > > 1) 'device-pixel-ratio: 2' is more readily understandable - ddpx is a mysterious abbreviation. > 2) device-pixel-ratio is deployed in existing content (albeit with a webkit prefix); declining to standardize it seems likely to increase the scope of the prefix problem. > 3) device-pixel-ratio has actual deployment experience showing it is usable for its intended purpose. > > In what way is 'resolution: 2ddpx' better? It doesn't add anything new. It uses an existing mechanism to do the same thing. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 16:12:03 UTC