W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

RE: [css4-color] Grayscale shorthand (with alpha)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:01:14 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Rudolph Gottesheim <r.gottesheim@loot.at>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4031779A10373C4AB7B9FBAD218A8BAC060A48@CH1PRD0310MB391.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
My curiosity is more about...

Why is "perfect gray" special vs. the near-grays?

For example, are designers only interested in rgb(22, 22, 22, <somealpha>) or also rgb(22, 27, 32, <somealpha>)?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Brian Manthos
Cc: Rudolph Gottesheim; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css4-color] Grayscale shorthand (with alpha)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I'm curious to hear more about why gray is so popular from an artistic / designer perspective.
> Is it the "black and white" muted photo affect (in which case a filter might be better)?   I have a few other guesses as well.

"gray" is a wide term here.  Anything between white and black is covered there, and those two colors are definitely quite common.  I gave a use-case where near-white and near-black are often used for background and text to reduce the harshness of pure black-on-white contrast.  Writing that out requires, currently, repeating yourself.
There's a potential readability win for this case.


Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 20:02:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:14 UTC