- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Daniel Glazman wrote: > I'm attending the W3C MultilingualWeb Workshop in Limeric, Ireland, > and a rather good question emerged related to the <em> element: > > should the <em> element be rendered using ‘text-emphasis-style' > instead of 'font-style: italic' for East Asian languages using the > :lang() pseudo? Assuming your talking about the default style for <em>, in theory, yes, that would seem like a more appropriate choice. As others have pointed out, there isn't a historical tradition of obliquing to indicate emphasis in East Asian scripts. However, in practice, users *expect* obliquing because that's the current pattern. Most Japanese fonts lack italic faces but Japanese users will complain if text is not obliqued within <em> elements (which I can confirm, having fixed these types of bugs). In a way, the prevalence of synthetic obliquing in all browsers (and WYSIWIG editors before that) has induced new typographic traditions, whether you judge them good or bad. So I would advise against changing the default here at this stage. Once 'text-emphasis-style' is widely implemented, it may be easier to switch as authors start to use this more widely. Cheers, John Daggett
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 05:25:42 UTC