Currently the syntax of attr() is attr(<ident>, <type>, <fallback>) e.g. attr(bgcolor, color, black) I get rather confused with positional syntaxes, because I can never remember which argument goes first, second, etc. So I've been pondering alternatives and came up with attr(<ident> as <type>, <fallback>) e.g. attr(bgcolor as color, black) which makes it less positional -- the type is more closely tied to the attribute name than to the fallback, and then the comma behaves to separate alternatives like it does in font-family. Thoughts? ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 15 September 2011 23:08:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC