On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Currently the syntax of attr() is > attr(<ident>, <type>, <fallback>) > e.g. > attr(bgcolor, color, black) > > I get rather confused with positional syntaxes, because I can never remember > which > argument goes first, second, etc. So I've been pondering alternatives and > came up > with > attr(<ident> as <type>, <fallback>) > e.g. > attr(bgcolor as color, black) > > which makes it less positional -- the type is more closely tied to the > attribute > name than to the fallback, and then the comma behaves to separate > alternatives > like it does in font-family. +1 to more intuitive function syntaxes with less commas. ~TJReceived on Thursday, 15 September 2011 23:24:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC