- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:24:09 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Currently the syntax of attr() is > attr(<ident>, <type>, <fallback>) > e.g. > attr(bgcolor, color, black) > > I get rather confused with positional syntaxes, because I can never remember > which > argument goes first, second, etc. So I've been pondering alternatives and > came up > with > attr(<ident> as <type>, <fallback>) > e.g. > attr(bgcolor as color, black) > > which makes it less positional -- the type is more closely tied to the > attribute > name than to the fallback, and then the comma behaves to separate > alternatives > like it does in font-family. +1 to more intuitive function syntaxes with less commas. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 23:24:57 UTC