On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported... > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css- > > # background-image only gradients > > That's weird. I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in Images > 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were > kicked to level 4 at the same time. I dunno why Transitions would > reference only gradients. The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for quite a while. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ 𝄂Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:33:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC