Re: when do transitions occur?

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:32 AM, L. David Baron <> wrote:
> On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos <> wrote:
>> > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported...
>> >
>> > #       background-image        only gradients
>> That's weird.  I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in Images
>> 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were
>> kicked to level 4 at the same time.  I dunno why Transitions would
>> reference only gradients.
> The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image
> being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for
> quite a while.

Right; it's just odd that it ever got into such a state.  I'm not sure
if Image Values was ever in an in-between state where I defined how to
transition gradients but not general images.


Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:39:09 UTC