W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: when do transitions occur?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:38:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCHDETVGwXVS3cWeNXvDPv_MM0bc3_0w6CGfsGQkNuRkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:32 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported...
>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css-
>> > #       background-image        only gradients
>> That's weird.  I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in Images
>> 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were
>> kicked to level 4 at the same time.  I dunno why Transitions would
>> reference only gradients.
> The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image
> being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for
> quite a while.

Right; it's just odd that it ever got into such a state.  I'm not sure
if Image Values was ever in an in-between state where I defined how to
transition gradients but not general images.

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:39:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC