- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:31:28 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Request: David, can you make sure a link to the ED gets added to the WD below? A general web search for "CSS3 transitions" hits on the WD and I went looking briefly to see if there was a (newer) ED but didn't find one quickly. Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 8:32 AM > To: Tab Atkins Jr. > Cc: Brian Manthos; Øyvind Stenhaug; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: when do transitions occur? > > On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos > <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being > animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported... > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css- > > > # background-image only gradients > > > > That's weird. I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in > Images > > 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were > > kicked to level 4 at the same time. I dunno why Transitions would > > reference only gradients. > > The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image > being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for > quite a while. > > -David > > -- > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > 𝄢 Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ 𝄂
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 19:32:00 UTC