W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] reasons for flex-order being <number> instead of <integer>?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:50:13 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbTZ9ctzhfM7yVx0gWm2JOR2PgvMWajSQAX0k6KGMyLqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> For some reason I thought z-index accepted a <number>.
> It seems more convenient to have a <number>, because it's easier to
> slot things between other things.  It's not a big deal, though, and
> I'm fine with being consistent with z-index.

I think it would make sense for flex-order to support <number> and to
extend z-index to support <number> as well. I'm sure it would make authors'
lives easier in some cases, and it would be easy to implement.

"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us
our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not
sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2011 23:50:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:05 UTC