Re: [css3-flexbox] reasons for flex-order being <number> instead of <integer>?

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> For some reason I thought z-index accepted a <number>.
>>
>> It seems more convenient to have a <number>, because it's easier to
>> slot things between other things.  It's not a big deal, though, and
>> I'm fine with being consistent with z-index.
>
> I think it would make sense for flex-order to support <number> and to extend
> z-index to support <number> as well. I'm sure it would make authors' lives
> easier in some cases, and it would be easy to implement.

That also works for me.

~TJ

Received on Sunday, 30 October 2011 23:55:11 UTC