- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:40:02 +0900
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:55:20 +0900, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > - RESOLVED: vh/vw/vm stay as percentages of viewport size; clarify > spec > ISSUE-194 http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/194 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0464.html > Florian: ppl are confused about whether it's 1/100th or just 1x > Florian: Do we want to change that? > fantasai: I think part of the problem is the spec was not very clear > in > tying these to the idea of percentages, which make the > 1/100th > factor seem less arbitrary. > fantasai: Also, since IE has an implementation: chances are vh and vw > are more used than vm, also this would be an interpretation > difference, which is more of a problem; vm -> vmin would > just > trigger a parse error > fantasai: So I'm leaning towards not changing it > RESOLVED: vh/vw/vm stay as percentages, clarify spec Does IE not implement them with a prefix? It seems most people preferred having these work like all other units, without the magical 1/100 behavior. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 09:40:39 UTC