- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:45:40 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "Brian Blakely" <anewpage.media@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Are you basicly saying that since no solution is perfect we should have no solution to the problem at all? To me, it seems like the physical size of a device is (nearly) sufficient enough to adapt your design (Input/Output methods available should be taken in consideration too). If you want to challenge that idea, feel free, but come up with cases where having physical measurements of the device is a bad thing or don't help to solve a layout choice problem. -----Message d'origine----- From: Boris Zbarsky Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:34 PM To: Brian Blakely Cc: Brad Kemper ; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: User Agents Do Not Implement Absolute Length Units, Places Responsive Design in Jeopardy On 10/26/11 4:38 PM, Brian Blakely wrote: > Applications are typically intentionally created for certain classes of > device The result of that approach is that new classes of device are locked out of using the application. We don't actually want to encourage that, in my opinion. That is, assuming device characteristics other than the ones you actually queried for based on a media query is exactly what one should _not_ do. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 21:46:07 UTC