- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:51:17 -0400
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Sorry everybody... I don't know if that was a gmail error or what -- I was just as confused to see that it looked like I sent an email that wasn't mine. Clearly this was just a reply with nothing in it... Don't know how that happened - never seen anything like it. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > The regions spec currently states: > > "If the 'content' property is defined on a region, it has no effect on the > region's visual formatting." > > I'm currently only able to test this in WebKit using content: url, as the > rest of the css3-content values that work on elements that flow-from applies > to aren't implemented. But so far WebKit isn't following this portion of the > spec. If I define this on a div: > > content: url(someImage.png); > -webkit-flow-from: someFlow; > > Then that element's content is replaced with the image and consumes no flow > content. > > I'm thinking this may be preferable to what the spec states, as there are > values in css3-content that I might want to work with regions. Perhaps I'd > choose to insert an image in this manner. Or I might selectively set > 'content: none' or 'content: inhibit' on an element in the region chain, > then bring it back with 'content: normal'. > > What's the motivation for making flow-from trump content? Could we remove > that text? > > Thanks, > > Alan >
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 22:51:44 UTC