W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Comments from PFWG on CSS3 Speech Module

From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:22:23 +0100
Cc: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, List WAI Liaison <wai-liaison@w3.org>, List WAI PF <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2760B504-033B-4C16-BC6A-2C562B14EC90@gmail.com>
To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>

On 11 Oct 2011, at 20:25, Janina Sajka wrote:
> 7.)	voice-duration: <time>;
> This is another property that seems to provide very little value. For example, what would be the expected behavior given the following CSS:
> p { voice-duration: 1s; }
> Given the following markup.
> <p>Short paragraph.</p>
> <p>Longer paragraph. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer elementum interdum ullamcorper. Nunc et ante dui. Sed odio erat, dictum vitae adipiscing nec, aliquam sed nibh. Fusce pharetra ante dolor. </p>
> The first paragraph would be understandable, but should the second paragraph really be pronounced over a duration of 1 second? Probably not. Implementation of this would be tricky, too. Have any other vendors have expressed an interest in its implementation?
> voice-duration is marked as at-risk, and we support dropping it from the final specification. 

I agree that there are potential implementation and usability issues, thus why the 'voice-duration' property is marked "at-risk". I believe this was introduced into CSS3 Speech in order to match the SSML feature-set more closely, however personally I am not aware of any real-world usage.
For tracking purposes, I am marking this comment as "closed / invalid": there does not seem to be an issue with the property specification per-say (which is aligned with the SSML recommendation).
Let us know if this is a satisfactory response.
Kind regards, Daniel
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 09:22:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:05 UTC