- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:04:00 +0200
- To: "Brian Kardell" <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, "Rudolph Gottesheim" <r.gottesheim@loot.at>
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:07:12 +0200, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 7, 2011 5:02 AM, "Øyvind Stenhaug" <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:46:29 +0200, Rudolph Gottesheim >> <r.gottesheim@loot.at> wrote: >> >>> Has = been proposed yet? Would that conflict with any other syntax? >> "E~=F" parses as "IDENT INCLUDES IDENT". It's not clear to me if this >> is a > >> problem. > I think :matches would let you do that as specified now, right? I don't know what you mean. Do what? (The only interpretation I could come up with was that "E~:matches(=F) would circumvent the issue, but I'm not sure it's intended to allow a subject marker there. It's easy enough to avoid e.g. by inserting whitespace anyway, but it seems unfortunate if that would make a difference.) -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 13:04:42 UTC