- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:17:54 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:59:55 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Selectors 3 :not() did not accept compound selectors, so the second > suggestion won't work. > > How should we represent the fact that there was a :not() in Selectors 3 > that had a more limited syntax? Can people not just look at Selectors 3 for that? No need to keep all the historical baggage I think. We are not doing that for CSS modules either. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 1 October 2011 06:18:28 UTC