Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:59:55 +0200, fantasai  
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> Selectors 3 :not() did not accept compound selectors, so the second  
> suggestion won't work.
>
> How should we represent the fact that there was a :not() in Selectors 3  
> that had a more limited syntax?

Can people not just look at Selectors 3 for that? No need to keep all the  
historical baggage I think. We are not doing that for CSS modules either.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Saturday, 1 October 2011 06:18:28 UTC