W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:22:17 -0700
Message-ID: <4E8A1979.9060808@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/30/2011 11:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:59:55 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> Selectors 3 :not() did not accept compound selectors, so the second suggestion won't work.
>> How should we represent the fact that there was a :not() in Selectors 3 that had a more limited syntax?
> Can people not just look at Selectors 3 for that? No need to keep all the historical
> baggage I think. We are not doing that for CSS modules either.

People want to know what's new; this (informative) table is attempting to summarize that information.

(And yes, I have gotten requests for this information, it's not just me thinking it's a good idea.)

Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 20:22:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:04 UTC