Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

On 09/30/2011 11:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:59:55 +0200, fantasai <> wrote:
>> Selectors 3 :not() did not accept compound selectors, so the second suggestion won't work.
>> How should we represent the fact that there was a :not() in Selectors 3 that had a more limited syntax?
> Can people not just look at Selectors 3 for that? No need to keep all the historical
> baggage I think. We are not doing that for CSS modules either.

People want to know what's new; this (informative) table is attempting to summarize that information.

(And yes, I have gotten requests for this information, it's not just me thinking it's a good idea.)


Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 20:22:57 UTC