- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:37:34 -0800
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > Also sprach fantasai: > > > > I think it would be best to remove sections 11 and 12. At the very > > > least both sections should be marked for further discussion with an > > > appropriate issue: > > > > This was already discussed and resolved in May, and sections 11 and > > 12 are implementing that resolution, at least wrt CJK list styles. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0234.html > > John's proposal, which I support, overarches the discussion about the > scope of the algorithm. There has never been consensus on having > section 11/12 in the spec. I have asked for an alternative solution to > be presented: > > - Issue: should we replace the numbering systems described in chapter > 11 with spelled-out lists that can be expressed without defining > algorithms? Before deciding, spelled-out lists up to, say 100, should be > added for comparison purposes. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0449.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0505.html > > I expect it to be present in the upcoming WD. That issue is already present in the ED, at the start of chapter 11. I put it in there a few days ago. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 14:38:22 UTC