Re: [css3-lists] remove "Complex Counter Styles" and "Optional Extended Counter Styles" sections

Also sprach fantasai:

 > > I think it would be best to remove sections 11 and 12.  At the very
 > > least both sections should be marked for further discussion with an
 > > appropriate issue:
 > 
 > This was already discussed and resolved in May, and sections 11 and
 > 12 are implementing that resolution, at least wrt CJK list styles.
 >    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0234.html

John's proposal, which I support, overarches the discussion about the
scope of the algorithm. There has never been consensus on having
section 11/12 in the spec. I have asked for an alternative solution to
be presented:

 - Issue: should we replace the numbering systems described in chapter
   11 with spelled-out lists that can be expressed without defining
   algorithms? Before deciding, spelled-out lists up to, say 100, should be
   added for comparison purposes.

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0449.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0505.html

I expect it to be present in the upcoming WD.

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 09:48:13 UTC