On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:43:10AM +1300, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > FWIW this [proposed use of terminology] is inconsistent with CSS 2.1 at least, CSS 2.1 is self-inconsistent in this matter, so I'd emphasize that "WIW" isn't very much in this case. pjrm.Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 02:47:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:07 UTC