- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 -0700
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu> wrote: > In the 2011-08-04 ED, there's a mismatch between the glyph strings and > the comment following it for weights 5 down to 1, and it looks like the > comment's the correct one: presumably 1-5 should be α-ε (\3B1-\x3B5) as > the comment says rather than ΰ,α,...,δ (\3B0-\x3B4) as written in the > additive-glyphs entry. Whoops, not sure how that happened. I've made the edit, thanks! > (Incidentally, it would be nice if the glyph comment for hebrew included > the glyphs for 15..19: these are fairly pertinent values, particularly > 15 & 16; and a minor benefit of adding all five of them is that it > simplifies the task of anyone else who tries to parse the spec text and > includes a check that each (additive-)glyphs entry matches the comment. > > The missing glyph strings if you do want to add them > are: 19 'יט', 18 'יח', 17 'יז', 16 'טז', 15 'טו', .) Done. (I assume you caught the previous error by doing what you just described - parsing the sheet and matching the glyphs to the comment?) ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 16:44:06 UTC