In the 2011-08-04 ED, there's a mismatch between the glyph strings and the comment following it for weights 5 down to 1, and it looks like the comment's the correct one: presumably 1-5 should be α-ε (\3B1-\x3B5) as the comment says rather than ΰ,α,...,δ (\3B0-\x3B4) as written in the additive-glyphs entry. (Incidentally, it would be nice if the glyph comment for hebrew included the glyphs for 15..19: these are fairly pertinent values, particularly 15 & 16; and a minor benefit of adding all five of them is that it simplifies the task of anyone else who tries to parse the spec text and includes a check that each (additive-)glyphs entry matches the comment. The missing glyph strings if you do want to add them are: 19 'יט', 18 'יח', 17 'יז', 16 'טז', 15 'טו', .) pjrm.Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 06:43:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:06 UTC