- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:44:17 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Chris Jones <cjon@microsoft.com>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
± -----Original Message----- ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] ± Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:31 PM ± ± I doubt it'll move fast enough to make this a problem. ^_^ Define "it"... You can see how fast Regions spec is moving, I would expect same with Floats/Exclusions, then relevant positioning will want to keep up. ± Yes. The WG resolved several months ago to take on my draft as a ± deliverable. Where is your draft? To me it seems reasonable to have separate specs, especially if css3-position will include all of CSS2.1 positioning, with writing modes, precise definition of the hypothetical static box etc. If we plan on that we can keep a concise positioning section in css3-floats until it is moved to your spec. Alex
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 22:44:47 UTC