- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:50:08 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Chris Jones <cjon@microsoft.com>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > ± -----Original Message----- > ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > ± Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:31 PM > ± > ± I doubt it'll move fast enough to make this a problem. ^_^ > > Define "it"... > > You can see how fast Regions spec is moving, I would expect same with Floats/Exclusions, then relevant positioning will want to keep up. I don't think Regions will move to CR in the next few months, which is the point where it effectively "freezes". That's all I'd be concerned about for a Floats spec. > ± Yes. The WG resolved several months ago to take on my draft as a > ± deliverable. > > Where is your draft? http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b48H0 > To me it seems reasonable to have separate specs, especially if css3-position will include all of CSS2.1 positioning, with writing modes, precise definition of the hypothetical static box etc. > > If we plan on that we can keep a concise positioning section in css3-floats until it is moved to your spec. Sounds good. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 22:50:56 UTC