Re: Enhancing grouping of selectors

On 09/17/2010 03:50 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:37:11 +0200, Paul Duffin <> wrote:
>> What do you think?
>> Is this something that would be useful?
>> Does it conflict with other intended usages of () in selector syntax?
> See
> We should add this to Selectors 4 I think.


Added as :matches() in place of :any(), see
I think there were some other messages on that, but can't find them atm...

Also updated :not() to take the same notation.


Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 23:13:34 UTC