- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:46:33 -0700
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 21:49:28 UTC
On Mar 16, 2011, at 12:51 PM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > How do you define "if the transition was smoothley enough" ? I don't think > there's a one-fit-all definition. By that I meant the properties for which there is a range of values (generally with numbers, lengths, etc. In them), not just keywords. > For example, imagine a Metro-like button whith a 'red' background. If you > want to have a smooth transition to an 'orange' background, you may be > satisfied by a classical color blend. However, you may also want to decide > that changing the background color was a sufficient reason to trigger a > "checkerboard" visual transition. OK, that's another alliterative. I didn't consider that, so I guess we could just say that if you author a checkerboard transition, that's what you'll get, so be careful. > > > The last sample could be implemented easily using the "visual: <identifier>" > property: > > .parent > * { display: none } > .parent.firstChild { visual: first; visual-transition: push(left);} > .parent.firstChild :nth-child(1) { display: block; } > .parent.secondChild { visual: second; visual-transition: push(right); } > .parent.secondChild :nth-child(2) { display: block; } > > But maybe something simpler exists. How would you that using your proposal ? I think I'll have to get back yo you on that. I'm not sure I followed it all.
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 21:49:28 UTC