- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:31:15 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > [fantasai:] >> Ok, if we have interop on currentColor, we can update the spec that way. >> I'm kindof surprised, because if you do that for text-shadows, it's really >> almost never the right color. > > For text-shadow, I can understand how it's a weird default but that is also > the interop behavior today. There might be a better default - would something > half way between foreground and background colors work better ? - but the > interop and <shadow> consistency are already there. I also expect authors to > want to pick their shadow colors carefully so I don't think it will be a burden > in practice. It really is a testability/interop nitpick more than anything else. I know that I've never written a text-shadow without an explicit color, and have never seen one in the wild without a color either. They may exist, but I believe they're very minority. We don't really have to worry about it. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 00:32:07 UTC