- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:02:11 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 6/28/11 1:58 PM, Tab Atkins wrote: > While I certainly like many of the abilities that SVG fonts can bring, > I was under the impression that the problems with them run further > than what you list. For example, you theoretically have the ability > to add an<html:video> to a<glyph> (loading the data from a data: > url, if necessary). How does this work? There are several different versions of SVG fonts. SVG Tiny 1.2 fonts don't allow that sort of thing (since you can't put an <html:video> in SVG Tiny 1.2 at all). So it should be possible to standardize a definition of SVG fonts that restricts the glyph geometry descriptions in a sane way. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 18:02:48 UTC