- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:25:14 -0700
- To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com> wrote: > The solution based on a CSS pseudo-class was rejected on the basis that it > was impractical for reading system implementors. I don't understand what this reasoning means. Could you elaborate? ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 18:26:01 UTC